Comparison of Acute Responses to Isotonic or Isokinetic Eccentric Muscle Action: Differential Outcomes in Skeletal Muscle Damage and Implications for Rehabilitation

J. A. Alemany; D. C. Delgado-Díaz; H. Mathews; J. M. Davis; M. C. Kostek

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1327652

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Table of Contents

Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(01): 1-7
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327652

Physiology & Biochemistry

Comparison of Acute Responses to Isotonic or Isokinetic Eccentric Muscle Action: Differential Outcomes in Skeletal Muscle Damage and Implications for Rehabilitation

J. A. Alemany

¹Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States

,

D. C. Delgado-Díaz

¹Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States

³Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia

,

H. Mathews

²Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States

,

J. M. Davis

¹Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States

,

M. C. Kostek

¹Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Both isotonic and isokinetic eccentric muscle contractions are commonly used in muscle research laboratories to induce muscle damage, yet, the muscle damage outcomes between these 2 modes of eccentric contraction have not been compared. The purpose of this study was to compare modes of contraction for differences in muscle damage. 16 men were placed in the isotonic (IT: 110% of maximal isometric torque) or the isokinetic (IK: 120°/s) group, with each group performing 200 eccentric muscle actions of the knee extensors. Isometric peak torque, perceived soreness and CK activity were measured immediately pre and post exercise, and 48-h post exercise. Mean total work (~1 700 J) and peak torque per set (~265 Nm) decreased over the 200 repetitions (p<0.01), and was not different between groups. Damage markers changed 48-h post exercise (p<0.05): peak isometric torque (−13%), creatine kinase activity (+200%) and self-perceived muscular soreness (+4 unit change). Significant group×time interactions (p<0.01) indicated that peak isometric torque was 22% lower, and creatine kinase and self-perceived muscular soreness were 330% and 3 unit difference higher in the IT as compared to the IK groups, 48-h post exercise. When equating for total work, skeletal muscle damage markers are higher during IT vs. IK modes. This reflects differences inherent in contraction type and suggests that this should be taken into account during physical rehabilitation.

Key words

dynamometry - creatine kinase - isometric torque - muscle

Full Text

References

References
1 Biodex Multi-Joint System – Pro . Setup/Operation Manual. In: Systems BM. ed. New York: 2007: 23-25
2 Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’Brien WL, Bassett Jr DR, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs Jr DR, Leon AS. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S498-S504
3 Beaton LJ, Allan DA, Tarnopolsky MA, Tiidus PM, Phillips SM. Contraction-induced muscle damage is unaffected by vitamin E supplementation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 798-805
4 Brockett CL, Morgan DL, Proske U. Human hamstring muscles adapt to eccentric exercise by changing optimum length. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 783-790
5 Clarkson PM, Byrnes WC, McCormick KM, Turcotte LP, White JS. Muscle soreness and serum creatine kinase activity following isometric, eccentric, and concentric exercise. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 152-155
6 Croisier JL, Forthomme B, Namurois MH, Vanderthommen M, Crielaard JM. Hamstring muscle strain recurrence and strength performance disorders. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30: 199-203
7 Da Silva CQ, Cotte T, Vicard L, Chantelot L, Ferret JM. Interest of eccentric isokinetic exercises in cases of calcanean tendinosis and thigh muscular injuries: Prospective study results. Isokin Exerc Sci 2005; 13: 39-44
8 Di Monaco M, Vallero F, Tappero R, Cavanna A. Rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of controlled trials on physical exercise programs. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 45: 303-317
9 Dvir Z, Keating J. Reproducibility and validity of a new test protocol for measuring isokinetic trunk extension strength. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001; 16: 627-630
10 Guilhem G, Cornu C, Guevel A. Muscle architecture and EMG activity changes during isotonic and isokinetic eccentric exercises. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 2723-2733
11 Guilhem G, Cornu C, Guevel A. Neuromuscular and muscle-tendon system adaptations to isotonic and isokinetic eccentric exercise. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2010; 53: 319-341
12 Guilhem G, Guevel A, Cornu C. A standardization method to compare isotonic vs. isokinetic eccentric exercises. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010; 20: 1000-1006
13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
14 Heiderscheit BC, Sherry MA, Silder A, Chumanov ES, Thelen DG. Hamstring strain injuries: recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, and injury prevention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 67-81
15 Hibbert O, Cheong K, Grant A, Beers A, Moizumi T. A systematic review of the effectiveness of eccentric strength training in the prevention of hamstring muscle strains in otherwise healthy individuals. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2008; 3: 67-81
16 Lee J, Clarkson PM. Plasma creatine kinase activity and glutathione after eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 930-936
17 Lieber RL, Friden J. Mechanisms of muscle injury after eccentric contraction. J Sci Med Sport 1999; 2: 253-265
18 Loeb GE, Pratt CA, Chanaud CM, Richmond FJ. Distribution and innervation of short, interdigitated muscle fibers in parallel-fibered muscles of the cat hindlimb. J Morphol 1987; 191: 1-15
19 Lund H, Sondergaard K, Zachariassen T, Christensen R, Bulow P, Henriksen M, Bartels EM, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H. Learning effect of isokinetic measurements in healthy subjects, and reliability and comparability of Biodex and Lido dynamometers. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2005; 25: 75-82
20 Nguyen D, Brown LE, Coburn JW, Judelson DA, Eurich AD, Khamoui AV, Uribe BP. Effect of delayed-onset muscle soreness on elbow flexion strength and rate of velocity development. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1282-1286
21 Nosaka K, Clarkson PM. Variability in serum creatine kinase response after eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors. Int J Sports Med 1996; 17: 120-127
22 Nosaka K, Newton M. Repeated eccentric exercise bouts do not exacerbate muscle damage and repair. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16: 117-122
23 Ounjian M, Roy RR, Eldred E, Garfinkel A, Payne JR, Armstrong A, Toga AW, Edgerton VR. Physiological and developmental implications of motor unit anatomy. J Neurobiol 1991; 22: 547-559
24 Pasquet B, Carpentier A, Duchateau J. Change in muscle fascicle length influences the recruitment and discharge rate of motor units during isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 2005; 94: 3126-3133
25 Pasquet B, Carpentier A, Duchateau J. Specific modulation of motor unit discharge for a similar change in fascicle length during shortening and lengthening contractions in humans. J Physiol 2006; 577: 753-765
26 Pasquet B, Carpentier A, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Muscle fatigue during concentric and eccentric contractions. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 1727-1735
27 Remaud A, Cornu C, Guevel A. A methodologic approach for the comparison between dynamic contractions: influences on the neuromuscular system. J Athl Train 2005; 40: 281-287
28 Sorichter S, Mair J, Koller A, Gebert W, Rama D, Calzolari C, Artner-Dworzak E, Puschendorf B. Skeletal troponin I as a marker of exercise-induced muscle damage. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83: 1076-1082
29 Warren GL, Lowe DA, Armstrong RB. Measurement tools used in the study of eccentric contraction-induced injury. Sports Med 1999; 27: 43-59
30 Wasielewski NJ, Kotsko KM. Does eccentric exercise reduce pain and improve strength in physically active adults with symptomatic lower extremity tendinosis? A systematic review. J Athl Train 2007; 42: 409-421